Soter Logo

Platform

WorkflowsAutomate safety tasks end-to-end
RecordsBrowse and manage structured safety records
Use CasesSee every way SoterAI can help
#BuildWithSoterConcept builds on the SoterAI platform

By Role

For EHSBuilt for safety & EHS professionals
For InsuranceVirtual loss control for insurers

By Industry

InsuranceConstructionManufacturingWarehousing & LogisticsHealthcareOil & GasRetail & Hospitality
Explore all use cases
Pricing

Resources

Case StudiesReal results from real customers
BlogInsights on AI-driven safety
WhitepapersResearch & thought leadership
IntegrationsConnect your existing tools
Help CenterDocumentation & support
Log InTalk to our team
HomeWhitepapersAnnual OSHA Enforcement Review 2026

SoterAI Risk Intelligence/93 pages · third edition

Three years of OSHA enforcement,
read so you don't have to

The 2026 Annual OSHA Enforcement Review, published every September by SoterAI Risk Intelligence

Every inspection OSHA and the 22 State Plan agencies have opened since September 2023 is public. Almost nobody can read it. SoterAI Risk Intelligence can — and this is the annual public edition of that engine: eleven industry benchmarks, the controls behind them, and the rules inspectors are about to ask about next.

Introducing the SoterAI Annual OSHA Enforcement Review · 2026

We analyzed 199,031 inspections, 319,106 violations, and $834 million in fines

And distilled it into five findings that will change how you think about compliance. Here's a preview.

Finding 01

1 in 20 violations is the same one.

14,592

citations for working at height with no fall protection

The most preventable violation in the dataset — and still the most common.

Finding 02

Your next inspector probably works for your state.

50%+

of all private-sector inspections

State agencies now conduct more than half of all inspections. Federal inspections declined from 36k to 33k year-over-year, while state inspections held steady near 35k.

Finding 03

Federal OSHA visits less often. It costs more when it does.

$5,910

avg. federal fine vs. $3,512 avg. state fine

Fewer visits, higher stakes.

Finding 04

The #1 violation isn't a broken machine. It's a missing document.

9 of 11

industries where paperwork tops the list

Paperwork gaps are the leading driver of citations — not equipment failures.

Finding 05

Violations "down" in 2026? They just haven’t been counted yet.

25% → 100%

of violations recorded at 1 month vs. 6 months

Early data always looks better than reality.

01

The engine behind the review

Enforcement data is the closest thing the safety profession has to a live map of where regulators are looking, what they find and what it costs. It sits in millions of rows across federal and twenty-two State Plan rule books, in codes only a compliance specialist can decode, and it arrives months after the fact.

SoterAI Risk Intelligence continuously ingests the entire national enforcement record, cleans it, reconciles federal and state codes into one language of controls, and benchmarks every industry, sub-industry and jurisdiction against it. What used to take a consultant a quarter to assemble for one company now exists, refreshed, for every company at once.

It sees

Nearly 200,000 inspections and 320,000 citations from the last three years, indexed by industry, geography and rule — the complete public record, not a sample.

It translates

A citation number becomes a control — the thing a site either has or doesn't have. “1910.147” becomes “machine-specific lockout procedures, audited annually.”

It foresees

By tracking which rules are gaining share in national enforcement and which industries haven't been asked about them yet, Risk Intelligence names the controls a company will be inspected against before the industry knows it.

Risk Intelligence does not predict accidents. It reads the regulator's mind — from the regulator's own record — and hands you the controls to put in place before the knock on the door.

The same engine runs on your own data, not just the public record. Point it at your incident reports, near misses, hazard logs and internal policies, and it reads your history the way it reads OSHA's — surfacing the controls you've already been warned about, in your own words, months before an inspector ever asks. That internal record is often the most valuable signal a company has, and most of it has never been analyzed at this depth. See how to run it on your own data ↓

02

What the engine read this year

A three-year rolling window of every private-sector inspection opened between September 2023 and August 2026, federal OSHA and all 22 State Plan agencies combined.

199,031

private-sector inspections analyzed, Sep 2023 – Aug 2026

319,106

citations, each mapped to a control

$834M

in current penalties across the three-year window

23

rule books reconciled — 29 CFR plus 22 State Plans

Your next inspector is now more likely to work for your state than for federal OSHA — State Plan agencies open just over half of all private-sector inspections, and nearly a third of every citation in the country is written under a state rule, not 29 CFR. Federal visits are rarer, but they hit harder: the willful-or-repeat share of federal citations rose year over year, and the penalty per federal inspection climbed to $5,910, against $3,512 for a State Plan inspection.

03

Where your industry stands

Eleven target industries, ranked by penalty per inspection, with the single finding OSHA writes up most often in each — in plain words. The full review carries each to quartile benchmarks, three-year trends and paragraph-level findings.

IndustryCites/insp.Penalty/insp.Most-cited finding
Chemicals & pharma1.9$7,083Equipment serviced with no written, machine-specific lockout procedure.
Food & beverage1.7$6,518Maintenance and sanitation crews working machines with no written lockout procedure.
Transportation equipment1.8$6,176Workers wearing respirators with no medical clearance behind them.
Wood, plastics & minerals2.4$5,581No written lockout procedure; dust and silica controls missing.
Machinery & electrical2.1$4,684Equipment serviced with no written lockout procedure.
Construction1.5$4,468Roofers, framers and siders working at height with no fall protection.
Metals2.1$4,332Machine work with no written lockout procedure — guards missing on presses, saws and grinders.
Warehousing & distribution1.4$3,772Forklift drivers never formally trained and evaluated.
Retail & grocery1.3$3,285Forklift and pallet-jack operators never trained; blocked exits in the back room.
Agriculture1.5$2,854Chemicals in use with no written hazard communication program.
Healthcare1.3$1,905A bloodborne-pathogens plan that exists on paper but hasn't been reviewed this year.

Notice the pattern: in nine of the eleven industries, the top finding is a missing document — a written lockout procedure, a training record, a hazard communication program — not a missing piece of equipment. Inspectors cite what they cannot see on paper.

04

The questions coming next

By tracking which rules are gaining share in national enforcement and cross-referencing which industries haven't yet been asked about them, Risk Intelligence builds an invisible gap list for every industry — the controls a company will be inspected against before the sector knows it. Five rules gained the most ground nationally this year:

Stairways

Missing handrails and open sides on mezzanine and platform stairs.

Propane (LP-gas) handling

Forklift cylinders stacked by the dock door with no cage.

Bloodborne pathogens

Applies wherever a company designates first-aiders — almost everyone.

Air contaminants

Visible dust or fumes with no air sampling behind them.

Signs and tags

Biohazard labels, danger and caution signs, tags on defective tools.

Most industries have barely been cited under these yet — which is exactly why they matter. The full review carries an invisible gap list specific to each of the eleven target industries.

05

This is the public edition. Yours can be specific.

Everything in this review is computed from the public enforcement record — nothing is estimated or surveyed. SoterAI Risk Intelligence uses the same engine to place a single employer's own sites onto these benchmarks: its quartile, its trend against the industry, and its own invisible gap list, in minutes rather than a quarter. Layer in that employer's own incident, near-miss, hazard and policy data, and the benchmark becomes a plan — built from evidence no competitor can see.

Inside the full 93-page review

Benchmark cards

Quartile cut-points, federal vs. State Plan split, per industry.

Standard-to-control maps

The twenty most-cited rules per industry, translated into the control a CEO recognizes.

Circumstances & consequences

What's cited after an injury, which rules travel together, where willful and repeat penalties concentrate.

Beyond the public record

Want this built on your own data?

This review runs entirely on the public OSHA record. SoterAI Risk Intelligence can run the same analysis on your incidents, near misses, hazard reports and internal policies — often the most valuable signal a company has, and usually the least analyzed. Tell us a bit about your organization and we'll show you what it finds.

Build your own Risk Intelligence analysis

Tell us about your data and we'll show you what SoterAI Risk Intelligence finds.

Loading form...

SoterAI

Virtual loss control that reduces injuries and claims

Solutions

SoterAI PlatformWorkflowsRecordsSoterCoachErgonomic Assessment

Resources

#BuildWithSoterUse CasesCase StudiesBlogIntegrationsHelp CenterPricing

Compare

Soter vs SafetyCultureSoter vs VelocityEHSSoter vs TuMekeSoter vs InseerSoter vs FurtherAI

Company

About Usinfo@soteranalytics.comSoterAI Trust CentreSoterAI Privacy PolicySoterCoach Privacy PolicyTerms of Use

© 2026 SoterAI. All rights reserved.